|Nyesom Wike, Governor of Rivers State|
According to The Cable news, chairman of the tribunal, Suleiman Ambrousa, began delivering the judgment at 10:15am after the lawyers of Wike (second respondent) and Dakuku Peterside, the petitioner and Rivers state governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), announced their appearance for their clients.
The three-man tribunal held that Wike was not duly elected governor of Rivers state, adding that the election was flawed based on evidence presented to it.
It therefore ruled that a fresh election be conducted in the state within 90 days. Peterside had presented 56 witnesses who testified against Wike.
The report further states that some of the witnesses were directly involved in the April 11 governorship election in the state.
Wike, on the other hand, presented 24 witnesses, but the tribunal held that their testimonies were weak, and as such could not prove the governor’s case beyond reasonable doubt.
The tribunal also held that Wike’s witnesses made contradictory statements, further complicating the defendant’s case.
In its two-hour judgment, the tribunal also dismissed Wike’s petition over the power of the tribunal to entertain the case.
It can be recalled that Nyesom Wike was announced as winner of the governorship election back in April.
He said he would appeal against the judgment.